Who Were the Best and Worst Federal Reserve Chairmen Ever?
Today, April 29, 2026, marked Jerome Powell's final FOMC meeting as Chairman of the Federal Reserve. After more than eight years at the helm of the most powerful central bank in the world, Powell will step aside on May 15, 2026, when his term as Chair officially ends. Kevin Warsh, nominated by President Donald Trump, is poised to become the 17th person to lead the Federal Reserve, pending a final Senate vote. In an unexpected turn at today's press conference, Powell announced that he would remain on the Board of Governors as a Governor for an undetermined period, citing concerns about ongoing political pressure on the institution's independence.
Powell's exit gives us a natural moment to step back and ask the bigger question. In the 112-year history of the Federal Reserve, who were the great Fed Chairs? Who were the disasters? Which ones presided over the best stock market booms, and which had the misfortune of running the central bank during economic catastrophes? Who stood up to political pressure and who folded? Which incidents and controversies have echoed through the decades?
Here is the full story.
The End of an Era
The Federal Reserve held its benchmark rate steady at 3.5% to 3.75% today, an entirely expected decision that nonetheless made history because it was the last interest rate decision of the Powell era. The 8-4 vote contained four dissenters, the most since 1992, with three of them objecting not to the hold itself but to language in the statement that hinted at future cuts. The market interpretation was clear: with Powell on the way out and Kevin Warsh on the way in, FOMC members are already positioning for a different kind of central bank.Powell's tenure has been one of the most consequential, and one of the most contentious, in Federal Reserve history. He guided the U.S. economy through a global pandemic, a 40-year inflation spike, a banking scare in 2023, and an extended public pressure campaign from a sitting President. He inherited the job from Janet Yellen on February 5, 2018 and ran it through one of the strangest eight-year stretches the American economy has ever seen.
So how does Powell stack up against the 15 men who came before him? Where does William McChesney Martin Jr., the longest-serving Chair in history, fit in? Was Paul Volcker really the greatest? Was Arthur Burns really the worst? And what do we make of the Fed Chairs almost no one remembers, like Daniel Crissinger, who somehow oversaw the single best stock market run of any Fed leader ever?
Let us start with the full roster.
The Complete Roster of Fed Leaders, 1914 to 2026
Sixteen people have led the Federal Reserve since the institution opened its doors in August 1914. The list below uses the Federal Reserve's own numbering, which counts the pre-1935 Governors who were the active operating heads of the Fed. The Treasury Secretary held the ceremonial title of Chairman until 1936, but the day-to-day running of the central bank was always the Governor's job.| # | Name | Tenure | Length | Appointed By | Era / Notable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charles S. Hamlin | 1914-1916 | 2 yrs | Wilson | First Governor; founded the institution |
| 2 | William P.G. Harding | 1916-1922 | 6 yrs | Wilson | WWI financing; postwar deflation crisis |
| 3 | Daniel R. Crissinger | 1923-1927 | 4.4 yrs | Harding | Roaring Twenties bull market |
| 4 | Roy A. Young | 1927-1930 | 2.9 yrs | Coolidge | Resigned just before the Crash worsened |
| 5 | Eugene Meyer | 1930-1933 | 2.6 yrs | Hoover | Worst stock market collapse in Fed history |
| 6 | Eugene Black | 1933-1934 | 1.2 yrs | FDR | Brief but pushed for liquidity injection |
| 7 | Marriner S. Eccles | 1934-1948 | 13.2 yrs | FDR | Architect of the modern Fed; Bretton Woods |
| 8 | Thomas B. McCabe | 1948-1951 | 2.9 yrs | Truman | Forced out over the 1951 Treasury-Fed Accord |
| 9 | William McChesney Martin Jr. | 1951-1970 | 18.8 yrs | Truman | Longest-serving Chair; "punch bowl" speech |
| 10 | Arthur F. Burns | 1970-1978 | 8.0 yrs | Nixon | The Great Inflation; Nixon tapes scandal |
| 11 | G. William Miller | 1978-1979 | 1.4 yrs | Carter | Shortest tenure of any modern Chair |
| 12 | Paul A. Volcker | 1979-1987 | 8.0 yrs | Carter | The Inflation Slayer; Fed funds rate to 19.1% |
| 13 | Alan Greenspan | 1987-2006 | 18.5 yrs | Reagan | 2nd longest; "irrational exuberance"; housing bubble taint |
| 14 | Ben S. Bernanke | 2006-2014 | 8.0 yrs | G.W. Bush | 2008 Financial Crisis; Nobel Prize 2022 |
| 15 | Janet L. Yellen | 2014-2018 | 4.0 yrs | Obama | First woman; quiet, smooth tenure |
| 16 | Jerome H. Powell | 2018-2026 | 8.0 yrs | Trump / Biden | COVID; inflation fight; Trump pressure |
Stock Market Performance Under Every Fed Chair
The single cleanest way to evaluate a Fed Chair's tenure for investors is to look at how the stock market performed during their time in office. This is not a perfect measure. A Chair who inherits an economic disaster (Eugene Meyer) will be punished by the data, while one who lucks into a roaring bull market (Daniel Crissinger) will look like a genius. But over 112 years of data, the patterns are revealing.Below is the annualized Dow Jones Industrial Average return under each Fed Chair, using data compiled by U.S. News & World Report through July 2025 and updated for Powell's full tenure through April 2026. The numbers are price-only returns and do not include dividends.
Annualized Dow Jones Returns by Fed Chair
At the bottom, Eugene Meyer (1930-1933) presided over the absolute worst stock market period of any Fed Chair, with annualized declines of roughly 33%. Some of that was inherited disaster, but the Fed's tight-money response to the early Depression unquestionably made things worse. Meyer's inflation-adjusted annualized return of about negative 26% has never been approached.
DaveManuel.com's Note
Stock market returns under any single Fed Chair are heavily influenced by what they inherited and what was happening in the broader world. Eugene Meyer did not cause the 1929 Crash. Daniel Crissinger did not personally produce the Roaring Twenties. The most useful way to read this chart is alongside the inflation environment, the recession history, and the geopolitical context of each tenure. A Chair who keeps the markets calm during a crisis is doing a far harder job than one who happens to be at the wheel during a boom.Tenure Length: The Iron Men and the Brief Encounters
Length of tenure tells you something about how much political latitude a Chair was given to do the job, and how much trust each successive President had in their predecessor's pick. The two longest-serving Fed Chairs of all time, William McChesney Martin Jr. and Alan Greenspan, were both serial reappointments across multiple presidencies of both parties.Fed Chair Tenure Length, in Years
At the other end, the modern shortest-serving Chair is G. William Miller, who lasted only 1 year and 151 days before Carter shuffled him over to Treasury and brought in Volcker. Miller's tenure was so short and so unsuccessful that economic historians have generally treated him as a cautionary tale about appointing someone with a corporate, rather than monetary, background to the job.
The Most Notable Incidents in Fed Chair History
The job description of Fed Chair is technical, but the actual job has always been deeply political. Every Chair has had to navigate Presidents who wanted lower rates before elections, Congresses that wanted easier money for their districts, and Treasury Secretaries who wanted the central bank to play along with executive branch priorities. The most memorable incidents in Fed history are nearly all moments when a Chair either stood up to that pressure or buckled under it.1965: LBJ Physically Shoves the Fed Chair
In December 1965, Fed Chair William McChesney Martin Jr. led the Board of Governors to raise the discount rate, against the explicit wishes of President Lyndon Johnson. Johnson, who was financing both the Vietnam War and the Great Society on stimulus, was furious. He summoned Martin to his Texas ranch, dismissed the Secret Service, and according to multiple historical accounts, physically shoved the much shorter Martin against the wall while berating him about boys dying in Vietnam and Martin refusing to print the money he needed. Martin held the line in the immediate aftermath but later admitted he eventually softened his stance and described the moment as a personal regret. The incident remains the most famous physical confrontation in Fed history.1971-1972: Nixon and Burns on Tape
The most thoroughly documented case of presidential pressure on a Fed Chair came from the Nixon White House tapes, which historian Burton Abrams catalogued in detail in 2006. Nixon, ahead of his 1972 reelection, wanted easier money to lower unemployment. Arthur Burns, his old friend and ideological ally, eased policy during 1971 and 1972 even though inflation was already elevated. Whether Burns capitulated under direct pressure or genuinely believed in his own theory that supply-side and labor factors were driving inflation remains debated. What is not debated is that the Burns Fed laid the groundwork for the Great Inflation of the 1970s.1979-1982: Volcker's War and the Tractor Blockade
When Paul Volcker announced his new monetary aggregates strategy on October 6, 1979, the Fed effectively committed to raising interest rates as high as necessary to break inflation. Rates went to 19.1% by mid-1981. The 30-year mortgage rate hit 18%. Farmers protested by blockading the Federal Reserve building in Washington with tractors. Auto dealers mailed coffins containing the keys of unsold cars. Construction workers shipped sawed-off two-by-fours with angry messages attached. Volcker required a personal security detail. Texas Congressman Henry Gonzalez introduced legislation to impeach him. Inflation eventually fell from a peak of 14.8% in March 1980 to 3.8% by the end of 1982. The recession was brutal, but the Volcker Fed restored the institution's credibility after a decade of drift.1996: Greenspan's "Irrational Exuberance"
On December 5, 1996, Alan Greenspan inserted a single phrase into a speech at the American Enterprise Institute that became one of the most famous lines in Federal Reserve history. He asked rhetorically how the central bank could know when "irrational exuberance" had unduly escalated asset prices. Markets sold off worldwide on the implication that the Fed might tighten. The phrase, which Greenspan later said came to him in the bathtub while writing the speech, attached itself to the dot-com bubble of the 1990s and the housing bubble of the 2000s, and has been used to describe practically every speculative mania since.2008: Bernanke and the Lehman Decision
Ben Bernanke faced a genuine financial system collapse in September 2008. He coordinated emergency capital injections at AIG, brokered the Bank of America acquisition of Merrill Lynch, and decided not to bail out Lehman Brothers, a choice that remains the most second-guessed call of his tenure. The Fed under Bernanke cut rates from 5.25% to effectively zero within a year, then launched three rounds of quantitative easing that expanded the central bank's balance sheet by trillions of dollars. He was Time's Person of the Year in 2009 and won the 2022 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his earlier academic research on banks and financial crises.2018-2026: Trump versus Powell
Jerome Powell's tenure included the most sustained public pressure campaign by a sitting President against a Fed Chair in modern history. President Trump publicly called Powell a "numbskull" and a "moron," and in July 2025 floated the idea of dismissing him over the handling of a $2.5 billion renovation project at the Eccles Building. The Department of Justice opened, then dropped, an investigation into Powell's congressional testimony about the renovation. Powell stood his ground throughout and announced today that he will remain on the Board as a Governor for an indefinite period after his term as Chair ends, citing the unprecedented attacks on the institution. The unusual decision will deny President Trump a chance to fill that seat with his own appointee.The Best of the Best: Top Tier Fed Chairs
When you separate luck from skill, a handful of Fed Chairs clearly stand out for what they did with what they inherited. The criteria that matter are: did inflation come down, did the financial system stay intact, did the institution emerge with its credibility enhanced, and did the markets finish in a better place than they started.Paul Volcker (1979-1987) Legend
Volcker is the consensus choice for greatest Fed Chair of the modern era and probably the entire history of the institution. He inherited an inflation crisis that prior Chairs had treated as politically untouchable. He took rates to levels never seen before or since. He absorbed the political damage. He restored the Fed's credibility. He delivered the second-best stock market returns of any Fed Chair on the way out, despite running the brutal early-1980s recession. The "Volcker Rule" later restricted high-risk bank investments after the 2008 crisis, an extension of his career-long fight for sound money and prudent regulation.William McChesney Martin Jr. (1951-1970) Legend
Martin gets less credit than Volcker because his fights were quieter, but his contribution was structural. He came in right after the 1951 Treasury-Fed Accord, the deal that finally separated the central bank from direct Treasury control after WWII. He spent the next 18 years defending that independence against five presidents, including the LBJ ranch incident. He institutionalized the FOMC consensus process. The "punch bowl" speech is still the most quoted line in Fed history. Without Martin, there is no modern independent Federal Reserve.Marriner Eccles (1934-1948) Legend
Eccles is the architect of the modern central bank as we know it. He helped design the Banking Act of 1935, which created the Board of Governors structure, ended the Treasury Secretary's ex-officio role, and centralized monetary policy authority. He served the Fed through the recovery from the Depression, World War II, and Bretton Woods. The Federal Reserve building bears his name for a reason.Janet Yellen (2014-2018) Solid
Yellen ran one of the smoothest Fed tenures on record. Inflation stayed below target. Unemployment fell from 6.7% to 4.1%. She launched quantitative tightening carefully and without disrupting markets. The Dow gained 13.5% annually under her watch, and the inflation-adjusted return of 11.9% is the second-best in Fed history behind only Crissinger's lucky-timed Roaring Twenties run. She was the first woman to lead the Fed and was succeeded as Chair by Powell, but later returned to government as Treasury Secretary in the Biden administration.Alan Greenspan (1987-2006) Mixed
Greenspan's reputation has aged in interesting ways. While he was in office, he was the most respected central banker in the world, the man who could move markets with a murmur. The Dow more than quadrupled during his 18.5-year tenure, the largest cumulative gain under any single Fed Chair. But the deregulatory tilt and the loose monetary stance from 2002 to 2004 are now widely viewed as having seeded the housing bubble and the 2008 crisis. The "irrational exuberance" line was prescient about the dot-com bubble and turned out to apply, in retrospect, to housing as well.The Worst of the Worst: Bottom Tier Fed Chairs
G. William Miller (1978-1979) Poor
Miller is the consensus choice for worst Fed Chair of the modern era. A textile executive with no monetary background, he was reluctant to raise rates even as inflation accelerated and the dollar collapsed. By November 1978, less than a year into his tenure, the dollar had fallen 34% against the German mark and 42% against the yen. Carter quietly moved him to Treasury after only 1 year and 151 days, replaced him with Volcker, and the new Chair had to clean up the mess with the brutal 1980-1982 recession. Miller's main legacy at the Fed was an unsuccessful attempt to ban smoking at FOMC meetings. No corporate CEO has been appointed to lead the Fed in the four decades since.Arthur Burns (1970-1978) Poor
Burns is the most fascinating disaster in Fed history because he absolutely should have known better. His own academic work in 1969 had explicitly warned that creeping inflation was a chronic threat. Yet his Fed eased policy through 1971 and 1972 with inflation already elevated. The Nixon tapes show how directly the President pressured him. By 1974, inflation was 12.3% and the country was in recession. Burns later went to West Germany as Reagan's ambassador, but his name has become shorthand for capitulation to political pressure. Today, every modern Fed Chair worries about being called the next Arthur Burns.Eugene Meyer (1930-1933) Poor
Meyer is the hardest case to judge fairly because the early Depression genuinely was an impossible situation. But the Fed's tight-money response made things worse. Stock market returns under Meyer were negative 33% annualized, the worst of any Fed Chair. Unemployment nearly tripled, from 8.9% to 24.9%. Deflation doubled from 4% to 8%. Meyer eventually went on to buy The Washington Post in 1933, where his daughter Katharine Graham would later become one of American journalism's most important figures. His Fed tenure, however, remains a study in central banking failure.Roy A. Young (1927-1930) Poor
Young had the misfortune of running the Fed during the lead-up to the Crash of 1929 and resigning just months after Black Tuesday. His record on stock returns is decent for his actual tenure, but the Fed under his watch did little to lean against the asset bubble that was building, and his quick exit before the worst of the Depression hit means he is often graded down by historians who view his tenure as an early example of a Fed leader who did not anticipate the crisis until it was too late.The DaveManuel.com Top 10 Fed Chairmen of All Time
This is the centerpiece. We graded all 16 Fed Chairs across four factors: economic and market performance during their tenure, competence and decision quality in handling crises, institutional impact on the Federal Reserve as an organization, and controversy and political handling. The result is the list below.Paul A. Volcker
The Inflation Slayer. Took the Fed funds rate to 19.1%. Endured tractor blockades, impeachment threats, and security details. Restored institutional credibility. Delivered second-best stock returns of any Chair despite a deliberate recession. The standard against which every modern Chair is measured.William McChesney Martin Jr.
Longest-serving Chair in history. Defender of independence across five presidencies. Got physically shoved by LBJ and held the line in the moment. Coined the "punch bowl" doctrine. The reason the modern Fed has the institutional spine that it does.Marriner S. Eccles
Architect of the modern Fed. Helped write the Banking Act of 1935. Oversaw the recovery from the Depression and the WWII financing arrangement. The Eccles Building in Washington is named after him. Foundational figure who is somewhat underrated outside of monetary policy circles.Janet L. Yellen
The smoothest tenure in modern Fed history. First female Chair. Strong stock returns, low inflation, falling unemployment, careful balance sheet normalization. Later returned to public life as Treasury Secretary. Trump declined to reappoint her, which is essentially the only thing held against her.Ben S. Bernanke
The right person at the right time for the 2008 crisis. His academic specialty was the Great Depression, and he applied that expertise during the most dangerous financial collapse since the 1930s. Pioneered modern QE and forward guidance. Won the 2022 Nobel Prize in Economics. The Lehman decision is the one persistent black mark.Alan Greenspan
The ultimate "depends on when you ask" Chair. Through the late 1990s, he was the most respected central banker alive. Post-2008, his deregulatory legacy and the 2002-2004 easy money stance look like prologue to the housing crisis. The Dow more than quadrupled under his watch, but two bubbles formed during his tenure as well.Jerome H. Powell
The pandemic Chair. Cut rates to zero in March 2020. Engineered the most aggressive tightening cycle since Volcker to fight post-COVID inflation. Endured a sustained public pressure campaign from a sitting President without flinching. Stock returns of roughly 9% annualized on the Dow and 14.7% on the S&P 500. The bond market suffered, but stocks finished near record highs. The full verdict on Powell will depend on whether the inflation fight ultimately succeeds.Daniel R. Crissinger
Best stock market returns in Fed history at 17.7% annualized. Almost entirely a function of being in the right chair at the right moment in the Roaring Twenties. He gets credit for not getting in the way of a historic boom, but historians generally do not consider him a particularly skilled Fed leader.William P.G. Harding
Ran the Fed through World War I financing and the postwar deflation crisis. Stock returns were modest, but the institutional task of getting through wartime and a sharp postwar adjustment was substantial. Solid B-grade tenure during a brutal era.Thomas B. McCabe
Short tenure, but McCabe negotiated the 1951 Treasury-Fed Accord, the foundational moment of modern Fed independence. Truman essentially forced him out for refusing to keep buying Treasuries at the pegged wartime rate. He took the institutional hit so the next 75 years of Fed independence could exist. Underrated.The Bottom Six (Ranked Worst to Least Bad)
G. William Miller Worst
Shortest modern tenure for a reason. Inflation accelerated, the dollar collapsed, and Carter moved him to Treasury within a year. No business executive has been appointed to lead the Fed since.Arthur F. Burns
The cautionary tale every modern Fed Chair invokes. Capitulated to Nixon, fueled the Great Inflation, and required Volcker's brutal cleanup. The Nixon tapes still embarrass his memory.Eugene Meyer
Worst stock market performance of any Fed leader. The Depression context is brutal, but the Fed's tight-money response made it worse.Roy A. Young
Did little to lean against the late-1920s asset bubble. Resigned shortly after Black Tuesday, before the worst of the Depression.Charles S. Hamlin
The first Governor of the brand new institution. Mostly held the seat while the Fed established its initial procedures. Not really enough tenure to grade fairly.Eugene Black
One of the few governors to push for major open-market security purchases during the Depression. Stocks gained 11% during his short tenure. Health forced him out before he could really make a mark, but historians have suggested he might have ranked far higher had he stayed longer.Where Does Powell Rank?
Powell finishes seventh on our list, which puts him squarely in the upper half of Fed history. The full verdict on his tenure depends on three things: whether the post-COVID inflation fight ends with inflation back at 2%, whether the Fed's independence survives the institutional stress of the past few years, and whether the bond market eventually recovers from the 2022 losses that defined the second half of his tenure.Defenders point to the COVID response as a textbook case of central bank crisis management. The Fed cut rates to zero, deployed emergency lending facilities, and helped engineer one of the fastest economic recoveries in modern history. Critics point to the 2021 stretch where Powell repeatedly described inflation as transitory before pivoting hard in 2022 to the most aggressive rate-hiking cycle since Volcker.
What seems likely to age well is Powell's defense of institutional independence. As Brookings senior fellow David Wessel suggested in a recent interview, Powell will probably be remembered as the Chair who stood up for the independence of the Fed and the rule of law. His decision today to remain on the Board as a Governor, rather than walk out the door and let President Trump fill the seat, is the final exclamation point on that legacy.
What's Next: Kevin Warsh and the 17th Chair
Kevin Warsh, the Stanford-educated investment banker and former Fed Governor (2006-2011), is set to become the 17th person to lead the Federal Reserve once the full Senate confirms him. Warsh was Ben Bernanke's primary liaison to Wall Street during the 2008 crisis and is generally viewed by markets as a credible, experienced choice. He has signaled an interest in deleveraging the Fed's balance sheet and revisiting the institution's communications strategy.The challenges Warsh will inherit are substantial. Headline inflation is at 3.3% as of March, well above the 2% target, driven in part by the Iran war and a spike in energy prices. The labor market has weakened, with hiring grinding to a near-halt though layoffs remain low. The political environment is the most pressurized for a Fed Chair since at least the Burns era. Markets are pricing in rate cuts at the June meeting, which would be Warsh's first as Chair if his confirmation goes through on schedule.
The big question for Warsh is which Fed Chair model he is going to follow. Volcker's institutional spine. Greenspan's market-friendly mystique. Bernanke's crisis playbook. Powell's quiet defiance. Or, less encouragingly, the Burns model that everyone in the building wants to avoid.
Closing Thoughts
The Federal Reserve has now been led by 16 people across 112 years. Two of them, William McChesney Martin Jr. and Alan Greenspan, served almost two decades each. One of them, G. William Miller, lasted barely more than a year. One of them, Eugene Meyer, presided over a 33% annualized stock market collapse. Another, Daniel Crissinger, presided over a 17.7% annualized boom that has never been equaled.The pattern across the entire history is that the great Fed Chairs are the ones who held the line on independence even when it was politically costly. Volcker did it during the 1981-1982 recession. Martin did it at the LBJ ranch. Eccles did it during the postwar Treasury showdown. Powell did it during the 2018 tariff fights and again during the 2025 pressure campaign. The bad Fed Chairs are the ones who folded, who put the President's reelection ahead of price stability, who stayed too short or fought too little.
By that standard, the Powell tenure that ends in three weeks looks much better than the political noise around it would suggest. He fought inflation. He held the institution. He delivered roughly 9% annualized returns on the Dow and 14.7% on the S&P 500. He took the punches and refused to leave with his head down.
Number seven all-time. Not bad for a lawyer and investment banker with no formal economics PhD, in a job that since Greenspan has been increasingly reserved for academic economists.
Now we wait to see what Kevin Warsh will be.
Filed under: General Knowledge