Skip to content
Special Feature · US Politics

Complete Midterm Elections History: Winners, Losers, Patterns

90%
Historical record, 1946-2022 · The president's party lost House seats in 18 of 20 midterms. A description of past results, not a forecast probability
-26Average Losses · House seats since WWII (-4 Senate seats average)
-125Biggest Disaster · House seats (1894 Democrats). Largest midterm loss on record
2022Recent Trend · Democrats lost only 9 seats. Best midterm in 20 years

01Complete Midterm Election Results: 1862-2022

President's Party Performance in All Midterms (1862-2022)

Seats lost by president's partySeats gained
Year President Party House Change Senate Change Result

02The Midterm Penalty

Why Presidents Almost Always Lose

These are the explanations usually given. The seat record below shows the pattern; it does not show which of these causes it, or how much each one matters in a given year.

  • Referendum Effect: Midterms serve as a referendum on the sitting president's performance and policies
  • Turnout Dynamics: Opposition voters are more motivated to vote; president's supporters become complacent
  • Buyer's Remorse: Swing voters who supported the president often regret their choice by year 2
  • Six-Year Itch: Second-term midterms have a reputation for being brutal (1958 and 1974 both -48, 2006 -30), but 1986 (-5) and 1998 (+4) break the pattern: the six second-term midterms from 1946 to 2022 averaged -23 House seats, against -27 for the other 14
  • Coattail Effect in Reverse: Weak down-ballot candidates who won on president's coattails lose when running alone

Average Seat Loss by Presidential Term

Average House seat change, 1946-2022 (second-term midterms: 1958, 1974, 1986, 1998, 2006, 2014; 1974 counted as Nixon's second term)

03The Rare Exceptions: When Presidents Gained Seats

Only 3 Times in the Last 30 Midterms (1906-2022)

1934Franklin D. Roosevelt (D): Gained +9 House, +9 Senate seats during Great Depression. New Deal programs were popular. Only time a president gained this many seats in midterm.
1998Bill Clinton (D): Gained +4 House, 0 Senate seats during his impeachment. Strong economy (66% approval per Gallup) and Republican overreach on impeachment drove Democratic turnout.
2002George W. Bush (R): Gained +8 House, +2 Senate seats after 9/11 attacks. "Rally around the flag" effect kept Bush's approval above 60% (62% in Gallup's Oct 14-17, 2002 poll, down from a 90% peak after 9/11). Only midterm gain in president's first term since 1934.

The Three Exceptions vs. Average Midterm

House Seats Gained/Lost

04Top 10 Biggest Midterm Disasters

Largest House Seat Losses in Midterm History

Democratic presidentRepublican president
Rank Year President Party House Change Senate Change Context
11894Grover ClevelandDEM-125-4Panic of 1893, severe economic depression
21874Ulysses GrantREP-96-1Panic of 1873 depression, Grant administration scandals
31890Benjamin HarrisonREP-93-4McKinley Tariff backlash, rising prices
41922Warren HardingREP-77-6Post-WWI recession, scandals emerging
51938Franklin D. RooseveltDEM-72-7Roosevelt recession, court-packing backlash
62010Barack ObamaDEM-63-6Tea Party wave, Obamacare backlash
71914Woodrow WilsonDEM-61+5Economic downturn, WWI anxiety
81910William TaftREP-57-8Progressive-conservative split in GOP
91946Harry TrumanDEM-56-12Postwar inflation, strikes and shortages
101994Bill ClintonDEM-54-8Republican Revolution, Contract with America

Raw seat counts favour the nineteenth century less than they appear to: the House had about 290 seats in the 1870s and 356 in the 1890s, against 435 since 1913. Measured as a share of the chamber, the 1894 loss of 125 seats was about 35% of the House, while 2010's 63 seats was about 14%.

05Recent Midterm Elections (2002-2022)

21st Century Midterm Results

Seats Gained/Lost by the president's party

Modern Midterm Patterns (Last 6 Cycles)

  • 2002 (Bush): +8 House, +2 Senate - Post-9/11 rally effect. Only gain in first term since 1934.
  • 2006 (Bush): -30 House, -6 Senate - Iraq War unpopularity. Democrats take control of Congress.
  • 2010 (Obama): -63 House, -6 Senate - Tea Party wave. Republicans' biggest gain since 1938.
  • 2014 (Obama): -13 House, -9 Senate - Six-year itch. Republicans take Senate for first time since 2006.
  • 2018 (Trump): -41 House, +2 Senate - Blue wave in House, but favorable Senate map for GOP.
  • 2022 (Biden): -9 House, +1 Senate - Smallest loss for president's party in 20 years. "Red wave" failed to materialize.
  • 2026 (Trump, upcoming): Election day is November 3, 2026. Going in, Republicans held the House 218-214, with one independent and two vacant seats, and the Senate 53-47 (Democratic total includes two independents), as of October 12, 2026. 35 Senate seats are on the ballot, including special elections in Ohio and Florida. Results will be added here once seat changes are called.
Year President House Change Senate Change House Control Senate Control Key Factors
2022Biden (D)-9+1R 222-213D 51-49Dobbs decision, Trump candidates underperformed
2018Trump (R)-41+2D 235-199R 53-47Blue wave in House, favorable Senate map for GOP
2014Obama (D)-13-9R 247-188R 54-46Six-year itch, ACA unpopularity
2010Obama (D)-63-6R 242-193D 53-47Tea Party wave, ACA backlash
2006Bush (R)-30-6D 233-202D 51-49Iraq War, Hurricane Katrina
2002Bush (R)+8+2R 229-205R 51-48-19/11 rally effect (62% approval, mid-Oct 2002)

06Party Advantages in Midterms

Which Party Has the Edge? Midterm Wins by Party (1862-2022)

Historical Party Performance

  • Neither Party Has Structural Advantage: Presidents of both parties almost always lose House seats - Republican presidents gained seats in only 2 of 23 midterms (1902, 2002), Democratic presidents in only 2 of 17 (1934, 1998)
  • Democrats as Opposition: 23 midterms under Republican presidents (1862-2022) - the president's party lost House seats in 21 (91%)
  • Republicans as Opposition: 17 midterms under Democratic presidents (1862-2022) - the president's party lost House seats in 15 (88%)
  • Key Finding: The opposition party has the advantage, regardless of which party it is. The president's party lost House seats in 36 of 40 midterms (90%).
  • Modern Era (1946-2022): Opposition party has gained House seats in 18 of 20 midterms (90%)

07House vs. Senate Midterm Patterns

Average Seat Changes: House vs. Senate (1946-2022)

Average Seats Lost by President's Party

Why House and Senate Follow Different Patterns

  • House (All 435 Seats): More volatile, reflects national mood immediately. Average loss: -26 seats
  • Senate (Only 33-34 Regular Seats, Plus Any Specials): Less predictable due to "map" (which states vote). Average loss: -4 seats
  • Class Structure: Senate has 3 classes (Class I, II, III) rotating every 6 years. Outcome depends heavily on which states are voting
  • Split Results: 6 times since direct Senate elections began in 1914, the president's party gained Senate seats but lost House seats (1914, 1962, 1970, 1982, 2018, 2022)
  • 2018 Example: Democrats gained 41 House seats (blue wave) but lost 2 Senate seats (defending 26 of the 35 seats up, 10 of them in states Trump won in 2016)

08Data Sources & Methodology

Data Sources & Methodology: House and Senate seat changes for 1934-2022 are taken from the American Presidency Project (UC Santa Barbara) series "Seats in Congress Gained/Lost by the President's Party in Mid-Term Elections", which uses the party divisions reported immediately after each election by the House Office of the Historian and the Senate Historical Office. That series begins in 1934. For 1862-1930 the change is computed from the same two offices' official party-division tables (House, Senate) as the change in the president's party's seat count from the opening of one Congress to the opening of the next. Background context draws on the Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives and Library of Congress election statistics.

Seat Change Calculations: Net change is the president's party's seat count after the midterm minus its count after the preceding election. In the American Presidency Project rows (1934-2022), Independents and Progressives are counted with the major party they caucused with; in the 1862-1930 rows only seats held under the Democratic or Republican label are counted, so third-party seats (Populists, Silver, Unionists and others) are left out. Counts taken on a different date, for example after later special elections, can differ by a seat or two. The 1866 midterm is not scored: Andrew Johnson had been elected on the National Union ticket and had broken with the Republican majority in Congress, so there is no clear president's party for that election.

Time Period: 1862-2022 (40 midterm cycles, 1866 not scored). Modern era analysis focuses on post-WWII period (1946-2022, 20 cycles) for consistency.

Historical Context: Pre-1913 Senate elections were conducted by state legislatures (17th Amendment established direct election).

Last Updated: October 24, 2026 | Next midterm: November 3, 2026

Corrections and Updates

DateWhat changed
October 25, 2026Added chamber-size context: the 1894 loss of 125 seats was about 35% of a 356-seat House, against about 14% for 2010's 63 of 435.
October 24, 2026Corrected Bush 2002 and Clinton 1998 approval figures to Gallup's pre-midterm readings and restated the party-advantage note from the page's own data.
October 24, 2026Seat changes now follow the American Presidency Project series for 1934-2022 and the House and Senate historians' party divisions for 1862-1930, with every total, chart and ranking recomputed; the unsourced state seat-flip section was removed.
October 24, 20262018 House change corrected to -41 seats throughout.
October 24, 2026Corrected the 2018 example (Democrats gained 41 House seats; 10 of their 35 Senate seats were in Trump states) and clarified the Senate seat count.
October 24, 2026Fixed the midterm counts (41 cycles, 1862-2022), corrected the top-10 biggest losses to include 1874, 1890 and 1946, recomputed the opposition-party stats and split-result list from the page data, and relabelled the change columns.

Every correction to a published figure on this site is logged on Sources and Methods.

Cite This Page

This page is free to cite and link. Please include the date you accessed it.

FormatCitationCopy
PlainDave Manuel, “US Midterms History,” DaveManuel.com, updated October 26, 2026, https://www.davemanuel.com/us-midterm-elections-history.php (accessed October 29, 2026).Copy
APAManuel, D. (2026). US Midterms History. DaveManuel.com. Retrieved October 29, 2026, from https://www.davemanuel.com/us-midterm-elections-history.phpCopy
ChicagoManuel, Dave. “US Midterms History.” DaveManuel.com. Accessed October 29, 2026. https://www.davemanuel.com/us-midterm-elections-history.php.Copy
Wikipedia{{cite web |url=https://www.davemanuel.com/us-midterm-elections-history.php |title=US Midterms History |last=Manuel |first=Dave |website=DaveManuel.com |access-date=2026-10-29}}Copy
Link (HTML)<a href="https://www.davemanuel.com/us-midterm-elections-history.php">US Midterms History (DaveManuel.com)</a>Copy

Page last updated October 26, 2026. How we build our data pages.